VICTOR HARRELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VICTOR HARRELL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
731 So. 2d 868
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant’s request for additional jail time credit is reversed and remanded for consideration on the merits in light of Hidalgo v. State, 729 So. 2d 984, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court did not have the benefit of Hidalgo at the time of its ruling.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jeri R. Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 822 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…lls of St. Pete Beach, Inc., 787 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). . Rodriguez v. Svinga Bros. Corp., 802 So. 2d 455, 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (citing Benitez v. Girlfriday, Inc., 609 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)); Glenn v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 731 So. 2d 868, 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“Whether an employer has the right to terminate an employee’s employment and whether a terminated employee meets the disqualification criteria set out in the unemployment compensation statute are separate issues.”); Baptist…
-
Myles v. State, 732 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…l court to review all pertinent records and calculate the appropriate credit for time served to which Myles is entitled, including time served in jail prior to sentencing and in prison prior to his release on community control. See Harrell v. State, 731 So. 2d 868, 1999 WL 330169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).…
-
Davidson v. AAA Cooper Transp. & Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 852 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…alified from receiving benefits. An individual discharged from employment for conduct deliberately, or culpably negligently, antithetical to an employer’s interests is not entitled to unemployment benefits. See Glenn v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 731 So. 2d 868, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see also § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003) (disqualifying those from benefits who have been discharged for misconduct connected with [*401] work); § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003) (defining misconduct). The unemployment co…
Authorities Cited
- Hidalgo v. State, 729 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)