GRACE CHRISTIANS, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT CHRISTIANS, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this marital dissolution case, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed in part the trial court's equitable distribution of marital assets, holding that the trial court erred by failing to include a corporate bank account worth $15,924 in calculating the fair market value of the husband's business, Flying Trapeze, Inc. The court affirmed the trial court's decision not to assign goodwill value to the business.
The trial court erred in failing to include the corporate bank account worth $15,924 in the business valuation when using a net asset method. However, the trial court did not err in refusing to assign goodwill value to Flying Trapeze because any goodwill rested solely on the husband's personal reputation and continued involvement rather than existing as a separate, distinct asset.
[1] A corporate bank account is a marital asset that must be included in the valuation of a business for equitable distribution purposes when the business is valued using a n…
[2] Goodwill of a business may be a marital asset subject to division in a dissolution proceeding if it developed during the marriage and exists separate and apart from the r…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The valuation of a business is calculated by determining the fair market value of the business, which is the amount a willing buyer and a willing seller would exchange assets absent duress.”
Establishes the legal standard for valuing marital business assets
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGrace and Robert Christians were married for nine years. Robert owned Flying Trapeze, Inc., a business that constructs and services trapeze equipment …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Business Valuation cases and more on FLexlaw
STEVENSON, J.
Grace Christians appeals the final judgment dissolving her nine-year marriage to her former husband, Robert Christians, and challenges the equitable distribution of the couple’s marital assets and the court’s failure to award her attorney’s fees. We reverse in part because the trial court failed to include the value of a corporate bank account in its valuation of the husband’s business, Flying Trapeze, Inc., but affirm on all other issues raised in the wife’s appeal.
The valuation of a business is calculated by determining the fair market value of the business, which is the amount a willing buyer and a willing seller would exchange assets absent duress. See Makowski v. Makowski, 613 So. 2d 924, 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Typically, fair market value measures the value of the assets of the business plus the value of goodwill. See id.
Flying Trapeze is a business whereby the husband primarily constructs and services trapeze equipment for lease or sale exclusively to Club Med. The husband acquired five trapeze units prior to the marriage and thirteen additional units during the marriage. Based upon evidence presented at trial by the couple’s experts, the trial court found that the fair market value of Flying Trapeze included only its tangible assets and inventory and that the business had no goodwill value for the purposes of marital distribution. The court valued the marital portion of the-business at $137,450 by assigning a value of $10,000 to each trapeze unit acquired during the marriage, adding the value of other inventory, and then subtracting the debt. The trial court, however, failed to include a corporate bank account worth $15,924 in the valuation of the husband’s business. Because the trial court used a net asset method to value the business, we find that the court erred in failing to tally the corporate bank account in the valuation.
Additionally, we find that the trial court’s failure to assign a goodwill value to Flying Trapeze was not error. Goodwill may be a marital asset subject to division in a dissolution proceeding if it developed during the marriage and it exists separate and apart from the reputation or continued presence of the marital litigant or the tangible asset. See Williams v. Williams, 667 So. 2d 915, 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Young v. Young, 600 So. 2d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The record contains competent evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that any goodwill of Flying Trapeze “rests solely on the Husband’s well-known reputation and abilities and his continued existence and involvement [in the business].”
Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand to allow the trial court to readjust the equitable distribution consistent with the holding in this opinion.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Soria v. Lucinda Soria, 237 So. 3d 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…2d DCA 1997)). "The valuation of a business is calculated by determining the fair market value of the business, which is the amount [for which] a willing buyer and a willing seller would exchange assets[,] absent duress." Christians v. Christians, 732 So. 2d 47, 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). "Typically, fair market value measures the value of the assets of the business plus the value of goodwill." Id. at 47-48. Enterprise goodwill, defined as the value of a business "which exceeds its tangible assets" and repr…
-
Held v. Held, 912 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…over and above its assets if the husband refrains from competing within the area that he has traditionally worked, then it is clear that the value is attributable to the personal reputation of the husband.” Id. at 1216; see Christians v. Christians, 732 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (no evidence of enterprise goodwill where evidence demonstrated that any goodwill of husband’s trapeze business solely rested on his well-known reputation and abilities and his continued involvement in the business); Williams…
-
King v. Kelsi King, 313 So. 3d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)…y such evidence. “The valuation of a business is calculated by determining the fair market value of the business, which is the amount [for which] a willing buyer and a willing seller would exchange assets[,] absent duress.” Christians v. Christians, 732 So. 2d 47, 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In determining a company’s fair market value, a trial court making an equitable distribution must consider all the company’s assets and all its liabilities. Bair v. Bair, 214 So. 3d 750, 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). It is error…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Young v. Young, 600 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Walfrido Hernandez v. State, 613 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
- Makowski v. Makowski, 613 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
- Verne F. Williams v. Williams, 667 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)