B.K.W., A CHILD, AND T.T.D., A CHILD, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disposition Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
B.K.W. and T.T.D. appeal disposition orders entered after they were adjudicated delinquent for armed burglary and grand theft. They contend that a separate disposition order is required for each offense, and that the challenged orders can be read to authorize supervision for more than the five-year statutory maximum authorized for grand theft committed by an adult. Agreeing with their first contention, we need not reach their second contention. We reverse and remand for entry of four separate disposition orders. See K.M.P. v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D420, 420, — So. 2d-,-, 1999 WL 77746 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 12, 1999); A.F. v. State, 718 So. 2d 260, 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); A.L.W. v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2227, D2227, — So. 2d -, -, 1997 WL 578660 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.16, 1997), approved, 717 So. 2d 913 (Fla.1998); J.M.J. v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1673, D1673, — So. 2d -, -, 1997 WL 369951 (Fla. 1st DCA July 7, 1997), approved, State v. T.M.B., 716 So. 2d 269 (Fla.1998); G.R.A. v. State, 688 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); E.Y. v. State, 670 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
Reversed and remanded.
MINER, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S.I. v. State, 784 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…quisite deadlines and ordered that the trial begin within 10 days, before which S.I. admitted to the offenses. The State concedes that the trial court should have entered separate disposition orders and sentences for each offense. B.K.W. v. State, 732 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); J.D. v. State, 732 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Finally, S.I. argues that the trial court erroneously imposed a public defender lien because it did not notify him of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien…
-
T.W. v. State, 775 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…itute illegal dispositions that require reversal and remand for entry of new orders.”). The state concedes error. See N.B. v. State, 746 So. 2d 1245, 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); KM.P. v. State, 735 So. 2d 506, 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); B.K.W. v. State, 732 So. 2d 447, 447-48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We reverse and remand for entry of separate disposition orders for each offense. BENTON, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. T.M.B., 716 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1998)
- G.R.A. v. State, 688 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- E.Y. v. State, 670 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- A. F. v. State, 718 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- State v. ALW, 717 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1998)