STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ANTHONY LOMACK, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
ANTHONY LOMACK, APPELLEE
732 So. 2d 471
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
STONE, C. J., dissents with opinion.
Dissent
STONE, C.J.,
dissenting.
I would reverse on the authority of Carlton v. State, 449 So. 2d 250 (Fla.1984), Swain v. State, 670 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), Clapsaddle v. State, 545 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), State v. Gallo, 279 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), Carr v. State, 529 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), and Baum v. State, 404 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), or, alternatively, on the authority of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (U.S. 1984)
- Carlton v. State, 449 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1984)
- State v. Gallo, 279 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
- Carr v. State, 529 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Clapsaddle v. State, 545 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- Swain v. State, 670 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Baum v. State, 404 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)