MARCUS DANIELS, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL MOORE, ET AL., RESPONDENT
MARCUS DANIELS, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL MOORE, ET AL., RESPONDENT
732 So. 2d 492
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We deny Marcus Daniels’ petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein he alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective. We note that Daniels’ allegations against trial counsel should have been presented to the trial court in a timely filed motion for post-conviction relief filed in accordance with Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987.
FARMER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Delaveaux v. State, 875 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…how-up identification was in accordance with the relevant legal standards. See State v. Hernandez, 841 So. 2d 469, 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review denied, 845 So. 2d 890 (Fla.2003). We find no error in the trial court’s ruling. See Shepherd v. State, 732 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Affirmed.…