JUAN MANUEL REGA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JUAN MANUEL REGA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
733 So. 2d 602
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Mitchell v. State, 598 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Guardado v. State, 562 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 576 So. 2d 387 (Fla.1991).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Manning v. State of Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 787 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…le for benefits. See Miller v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 768 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (stating that a reduction in income provided the employee with good cause to terminate his employment); Aleman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 733 So. 2d 602, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (stating that lack of available work constituted “good cause attributable to the employer”); LeCroy v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 654 So. 2d 1054, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (stating that a 5% decrease in pay was good cause a…
-
Kelly v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 823 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…”) (citations omitted); Miller v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 768 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that a reduction in income provided the employee with good cause to terminate his employment); Aleman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 733 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that lack of available work constituted good cause attributable to the employer); LeCroy v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 654 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that a 5% decrease in pay was good cause for leaving em…
-
Dunn v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Tesinc, Inc., 832 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…he twenty-seven-day period from his layoff with All-com until he voluntarily left Tesinc. Mr. Dunn was properly entitled to benefits for this period because the layoff was due to the employer, not Mr. Dunn. See Aleman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 733 So. 2d 602, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (stating lack of work constituted good cause attributable to employer). From our record, it is unclear whether Mr. Dunn received these benefits. The appeals referee never expressly granted or denied benefits for that period.…
Authorities Cited
- Claro E. Guardado v. State, 562 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- State v. Marsh, 576 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Mitchell v. State, 598 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)