TODD VERNON BOWMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Seminole Cnty. v. Tivoli Orlando Assocs. Ltd., 920 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …olution, Tivoli never pled how the disparate types could be joined as members of the same class with a common interest that would lead to a common right of recovery based on the same essential facts. Arvida/JMB Partners v. Council of Villages, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1026, 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Tivoli never pled, let alone proved, that multi-family projects, industrial construction, single family residences, and commercial retail projects with different construction modalities and costs could belong to the same c…
• Chateau Cmtys., Inc. v. Ludtke, 783 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …2d 1008 (Fla.1984), Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Fry, 753 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 5th DCA) (en banc), review denied, 773 So. 2d 55 (Fla.2000); Shoma Devel. Corp. v. Vazquez, 749 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Arvida/JMB Partners v. Council of Villages, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), review denied, 732 So. 2d 325 (Fla.1999).5 This seems especially true in a case such as this where the alleged fraud is based on a misrepresentation concerning what is required or per [*1231] mitted by law or by contract.6 Wheth…
• Found. Health v. Ricardo Garcia-Rivera, M.D., 814 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …ppellants’ claim that class proceedings are inappropriate because of the existence of arbitration clauses in some of the agreements between the defendants and the providers was both waived below, see Arvida/JMB Partners v. Council of Villages, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), review denied, 732 So. 2d 325 (Fla.1999); Hansen v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 408 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 417 So. 2d 328 (Fla.1982), and is without substantive merit. See Burns v. Prudential Securities, I…

Authorities Cited

• Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)