JONATHAN BARASH, APPELLANT,
v.
PSI INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Jonathan Barash seeks review of a temporary injunction to the extent that it enjoined him from competing with PSI Industries. He argues that such relief was not requested. We agree and remand for the trial court to strike that portion of the order as enforcement of the noncompete provision of the confidentiality agreement was not before the trial court. See e.g. Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Dev., Inc., 682 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
We note that Barash also argues that the $1,000.00 bond ordered is inadequate. The trial court may reconsider the amount of bond upon Barash’s filing of an appropriate motion.
Accordingly, we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Amado Evarito Garcia v. Stewart, 906 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…ew of the law’ is not one of the circumstances contemplated by the rule.”). Rule 1.540(b)(4) permits a court to “relieve” a party from a final “judgment, decree, order or proceeding” if “the judgment or decree is void.” See, e.g., Greisel v. Gregg, 733 So. 2d 1119, 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (citation omitted). Because the trial court was without subject matter jurisdiction when it entered the order distributing funds, the order was void and Garcia was entitled to have it set aside. In general, there are two a…
-
Johnson v. State, 973 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…(Fla.1984) (stating that no time limitation exists for a motion filed under rule 1.540(b) to vacate a void judgment), superseded by rule on other grounds as stated in Lefler v. Lefler, 776 So. 2d 319, 322 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Greisel v. Gregg, 733 So. 2d 1119, 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Del Conte Enters. v. Thomas Publ’g Co., 711 So. 2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). The record does not refute appellant’s claims that he was not served with process and had no knowledge that a paternity action had been com…
-
Fisher v. State, 840 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…is void as to Fisher. See S.B.L. v. State, 737 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). A void judgment may be attacked at any time because the judgment creates no binding obligation on the parties, is legally ineffective and is a nullity. Greisel v. Gregg, 733 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). The order finding Fisher in contempt for not complying with the restitution order is also void since it was based on the void restitution order. We reverse both orders involved in this appeal. Our ruling in this case is without…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Dev., Inc., 682 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)