DOUGLAS PEEBLES, M.D., ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

SHERIDAN HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Empire World Towers, LLC v. CDR Créances, 89 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
  …all state with particularity the grounds therefore, and shall set forth the relief or order sought.”). “The purpose of rule 1.100 is to put the opposing party on notice of the grounds which will be asserted against it.” Jaffrey v. Baggy Bunny, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The Bank fully satisfied the requirements of due process and rule 1.100(b). To begin with, the Motion to Strike contains a detailed explanation of the Cohens’ scheme to defraud the Florida trial court, including an allega…
• Clivens Goldman v. Campbell, 920 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …2d 372, 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Murphy v. Tucker, 689 So. 2d 1164, 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); and Pippin v. Latosynski, 622 So. 2d 566, 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). To those I would add our own decisions in Chip Development; Jaffrey v. Baggy Bunny, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); and Cohen v. Arvin, 878 So. 2d 403, 405-06 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), which involved some kindred variation to a failure to identify the statute in the offer. If the supreme court exercises jurisdiction over this case, I hop…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nugent v. Anne-Laure Michelis, 312 So. 3d 954 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)

Authorities Cited

• Hiles v. Auto Bahn Fed'n, Inc., 498 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
• Finkelstein v. Se. Bank, N.A., 490 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
• Hausbach v. Se. Bank, N.A., 490 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
• Mary Dee's, Inc. v. Tartamella, 492 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
• Action Elec. & Repair, Inc. v. Batelli, 416 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)