VONSHER ADAMS, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
VONSHER ADAMS, PETITIONER,
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
734 So. 2d 603
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus without affording petitioner the opportunity to reply to respondent’s response below. See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, the trial court’s order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is quashed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
JOANOS, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bard v. Wolson, 687 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Jones v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)