RONALD WALTER HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-06-02
No. 98-01895
NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
734 So. 2d 1154 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant, who was originally sentenced on April 13, 1998 to twenty-four months’ prison time with thirty-one days’ credit for time served, challenges the May 18, 1998 order resentencing him to four and one-half years’ prison with 419 days’ credit for time served. Appellant argues, and we agree, that once he began serving Ms legal sentence, the court could not increase his term. Resentencing on the same charge is a violation of double jeopardy. See Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Hinton v. State, 446 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Accordingly, we vacate Appellant’s sentence and remand for reimposition of the original sentence with the correct amount of credit for time served.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Knapp v. State, 741 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
    …ginal sentence imposed was not illegal. Cf Sims. Once a defendant begins serving a legal sentence, a court may not increase his sentence because to do so would violate double jeopardy. See Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Harris v. State, 734 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Therefore, we vacate Knapp’s amended sentence because the court lacked jurisdiction to impose it, and we remand with directions to reimpose the original sentence without the minimum mandatory terms. The Department of Corrections…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw