MICHAEL PAUL GANGE, A/K/A MICHAEL PAINE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-07-09
No. 98-03924
GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
736 So. 2d 154 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to provide the proper, modified jury instruction on entrapment.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of trafficking cocaine after the trial court refused to give a revised jury instruction on entrapment requested by the appella…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of trafficking in cocaine. Although he raises three issues on appeal, we find merit only in Appellant’s argument that the court failed to give the proper jury instruction on entrapment. Under Broker v. State, 726 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we must reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On July 16, 1998, the Florida supreme court modified the jury instruction required to be given in entrapment eases. The modification clarified and detailed the burden of proof in entrapment cases, explaining what the burden of proof is and who bears it at what point in the trial. See In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, 723 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1998).

The instant trial was held on September 23,1998, almost two months after the Florida supreme court, revised the entrapment instruction. Despite Appellant’s request that the jury be given the newly revised instruction, the court declined to do so, and gave the former version of the instruction. This is reversible error. See Broker. Accordingly, we reverse .and remand for further proceedings.

GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw