STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT ALLEN CASTERLINE, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ROBERT ALLEN CASTERLINE, RESPONDENT
736 So. 2d 1151
Florida Supreme Court (1999)
Caution
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Casterline v. State, 703 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), based upon conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.
Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Menendez v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., Inc., 35 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2010)…statute requires motor vehicle insurance policies issued in Florida to provide PIP benefits for bodily injury “arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle.” § 627.736(1), Fla. Stat. (2006); accord Blish v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 736 So. 2d 1151, 1153 (Fla.1999). The PIP statute is unique, in that it abolished “a traditional common-law right by limiting the recovery available to car accident victims” and in exchange, required PIP insurance that was recoverable without regard to fault. State…
-
United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001)…his issue, stated agreement with Jones, and certified direct conflict with the district court's decision in the present case. See AIXJ Ins. Co. v. Daidone, 760 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See infra note 12. . See Blish v. Atlanta Casualty Co., 736 So. 2d 1151, 1155 (Fla.1999). . Section 627.428(1), Fla. Stat. (1997), provides: (1) Upon the rendition of a judgment or decree by any of the courts of this state against an insurer and in favor of any named or omnibus insured or the named beneficiary under a…
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007)…statute requires motor vehicle insurance policies issued in Florida to provide PIP benefits for bodily injury “arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle.” § 627.736(1), Fla. Stat. (2006); accord Blish v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 736 So. 2d 1151, 1153 (Fla.1999). The PIP statute is unique, in that it abolished “a traditional common-law right by limiting the recovery available to ear accident victims” and in exchange, required PIP insurance that was recoverable without regard to fault. State…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Casterline v. State, 703 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)