JOHN FLOWERS, APPELLANT,
v.
ABOVE-ALL-ROOFING, INC. AND FCCI MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1999-06-30
No. 98-2050
ERVIN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., ■ concur.
737 So. 2d 594 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*595] PER CURIAM.

As appellees’ counsel conceded at oral argument, that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) had no authority to enter the order under review and that the order also had no legally binding effect on the parties, we vacate the JCC’s order determining that the employer/carrier was entitled to a vocational evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e) and section 440.491, Florida Statutes (1997).

ERVIN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Douglas v. Fla. Power & Light, Inc., 921 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
    …13.52[5][b] (2005). Because we find the 2003 amendments to be applicable, we deny the petition. HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., concur. . Arguably petitioner should have sought review of the JCC's order by appeal. See Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc., 737 So. 2d 594, 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (reviewing by appeal an order determining that the E/C were "entitled to a vocational evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e) and section 440.491, Florida Statutes (1997)”); Barnett Bank of Volusia County…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw