E. A. GRAHAM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
JOHN SEWELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
E. A. GRAHAM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
JOHN SEWELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
90 Fla. 205
Florida Supreme Court (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being noV'advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
West, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Bridgeman, 133 Fla. 195 (Fla. 1938)…e negligence on the part of the defendant and are not subject to demurrer on that score. Although those engaged in transmitting current for domestic use are not insurers (Key West Electric Co. v. Roberts, 81 Fla. 743, 89 So. 122; Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 205, 105 So. 330) they are held to a high degree of care. See Key West Electric Co. v. Roberts, supra. In the first count the negligence alleged is that the defendant negligently permitted one of their uninsulated wires, charged with a highly dangerous…