PAUL K. PRIDGEON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PAUL K. PRIDGEON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
737 So. 2d 636
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Pridgeon asserts that key evidence should have been suppressed because the affidavit upon which a search warrant was based did not give probable cause for the warrant.
We are unable to reach the merits of Pridgeon’s argument because, although a motion to suppress was filed and a hearing was held on the issue, trial counsel at each of Pridgeon’s trials failed to object contemporaneously to introduction of the evidence and thereby failed to preserve the issue for appeal. See Terry v. State, 668 So. 2d 954 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 728 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Randall v. State, 718 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Coffee v. State, 699 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED.
ALLEN, LAWRENCE, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. State, 776 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Pridgeon v. State, 737 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Davis v. State, 728 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). KAHN, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Terry v. State, 668 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 1996)
- Randall v. State, 718 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- R.E.P. v. State, 728 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Coffee v. State, 699 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)