STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLANT,
v.
KENT KNAUS AND NANCY KNAUS, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in calculating attorney's fees by misapplying the wrong statutory subsection and in awarding expert witness fees when not necessary.
[1] In eminent domain proceedings, the calculation of attorney's fees under section 73.092, Florida Statutes, depends on the specific procedural posture of the case.
[2] The calculation method set forth in section 73.092(2), Florida Statutes, applies only in cases where a party has defeated an order of taking, an apportionment is at issue…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Department of Transportation appealed an eminent domain case where the landowner rejected offers and settled for $15,000, and the trial court awar…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees In Eminent Domain cases and more on FLexlaw
SALCINES, Judge.
The State of Florida, Department of Transportation, appeals the trial court’s order determining attorney and expert fees in an eminent domain proceeding. We reverse.
The subject property in this eminent domain proceeding is located in Polk County, Florida, at the Clark Road overpass on Interstate 4. The property was acquired for use in the construction of the Polk County Expressway. DOT first offered the landowner, Michael W. Logue (as the executor of an estate), $4,700 and subsequently submitted an offer of judgment in the amount of $10,500. Both offers were rejected and the case was ultimately settled for $15,000. The court awarded the landowner an attorney’s fee in the amount of $18,112.50 and an expert witness fee in the amount of $962.50.
The award of the attorney’s fee in this eminent domain case was generally governed by section 73.092, Florida Statutes (1995). In determining the amount of that fee, the trial court incorrectly applied subsection 73.092(2), which sets forth factors to be considered in determining such an award. This method of calculation is employed only in cases in which a party has defeated an order of taking, an apportionment is at issue, or other supplemental proceedings have occurred. See State, Dep’t of Transp. v. Smithbilt Indus., Inc., 715 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The present case involved none of the foregoing; thus, it was incumbent upon the trial court to determine the attorney’s fee by applying the calculation set forth in subsection 73.092(l)(c)l., which limits the attorney’s fee to thirty-three percent of the benefits received. Because this calculation was readily determinable without resort to expert testimony in the present case, we also hold that the trial court erred in granting the expert witness fee. Upon remand, the trial court shall calculate the award of attorney’s fees by applying subsection 73.092(l)(c)l., Florida Statutes (1995).
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
PATTERSON, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Joseph B. Doerr Tr. v. Cent. Fla. Expressway Auth., 177 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. 2015)…sistent with Pierpont and Seminole County, and in accordance with the directives of the statute, Florida courts have awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to section 73.092(1) where subsection (2) has no application. See, e.g., Dep’t of Transp. v. Knaus, 737 So. 2d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Teeter v. Dep’t of Transp., 713 So. 2d 1090, 1091-92 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Dep’t of Transp. v. LaBelle Phoenix Corp., 696 So. 2d 947, 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Nonetheless, although the Legislature may establish reasonable pa…
Authorities Cited
- Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Remembrances Vintage Recreations, Inc., 715 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- State v. Smithbilt Indus., Inc., 715 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)