CARL C. MCCLURE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
TRAFFIC TRUCK SALES COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
CARL C. MCCLURE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
TRAFFIC TRUCK SALES COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
90 Fla. 356
Florida Supreme Court (1925)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, and being of the opinion that this case is controlled by Santa Rosa Co. v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86, 80 So. 748, and not by Brown v. Booth, 73 Fla. 67; 74 So. 212, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McKinnon v. The First Nat'l Bank of Pensacola, 77 Fla. 777 (Fla. 1919)
- Armour & Co. v. Hulvey, 73 Fla. 294 (Fla. 1917)
- The Cnty. of Santa Rosa & J. F. Poore v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86 (Fla. 1919)
- Chas. H. Brown v. Booth, 73 Fla. 67 (Fla. 1917)