VERSIAH M. TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1998-09-11
No. 98-1100
BARFIELD, C.J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
739 So. 2d 98 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for certification, and certify to the supreme court the same question we certified in Griffis v. State, 703 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), review granted, Case No. 92,160, — So. 2d - (Fla.1998):

SHOULD THE HOLDING IN STATE v. GURICAN, 576 So. 2d 709 (Fla.1991), BE RE-EVALUATED IN LIGHT OF ORTEGA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 507 U.S. 234, 113 S.Ct. 1199, 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993)?

BARFIELD, C.J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Versiah M. Taylor v. State, 759 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 2000)
    …strict court certified the following question: Should the holding in State v. Gurican, 576 So. 2d 709 (Fla.1991), be re-evaluated in light of Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507 U.S. 234, 113 S.Ct. 1199, 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993)? Taylor v. State, 739 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered this question in the affirmative in Griffis v. State, 759 So. 2d 668 (Fla.2000), wherein we held that where a defendant absconds and returns before…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw