8911 NORMANDY BEACH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS C. KEARNS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida seller appealed dismissal of its claim against an Illinois attorney holding escrow deposits for condominium purchases in Florida. The court reversed the dismissal, finding that the attorney had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida through his involvement as escrow agent for four property transactions to justify personal jurisdiction.
The court held that sufficient minimum contacts existed to support personal jurisdiction. Because Kearns agreed to act as escrow agent for four real estate transactions in Dade County, held deposits subject to liquidated damage clauses, and refused to tender the funds to the court registry, he should reasonably anticipate being sued in Florida.
[1] A nonresident defendant may be subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida if, due to their conduct and connection with Florida, they should reasonably anticipate being h…
[2] A single transaction by an out-of-state defendant may be sufficient to permit the exercise of personal jurisdiction in Florida, depending on the facts.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Sufficient minimum contacts exist between Florida and a nonresident defendant if the nonresident defendant, because of his conduct and connection with Florida, should reasonably anticipate being haled into court in Florida.”
Establishes the applicable legal standard for personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThomas C. Kearns, an Illinois attorney, held $225,000 in escrow at his client's request. The funds represented deposits for the purchase of four condo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Escrow Agent cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The seller/plaintiff below, 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc., appeals the dismissal of its complaint against Thomas C. Kearns for lack of personal jurisdiction. We reverse.
Thomas C. Kearns, an Illinois attorney, is holding $225,000 in his escrow account at his client’s request. The $225,000 represents deposits made by Kearns’ client for the purchase of four condominium units located in Dade County, Florida. The purchase agreements provided that the seller is entitled to retain the deposits as liqui dated damages in the event that the purchaser breached the purchase agreements. Based on an allege breach of the purchase agreements, the seller is seeking the $225,-000 deposit as liquidated damages. Kearns has refused to deposit the $225,000 into the court registry in Dade County. As a result, the seller has also filed suit against Kearns.
Kearns filed a motion to dismiss arguing that he lacks the minimum contacts necessary for personal jurisdiction because his only contacts with Florida are two letters that he wrote to the seller’s agent acknowledging that he was holding the purchaser’s deposits in his escrow account. The trial court granted Kearns’ motion to dismiss.
The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by granting the motion to dismiss. We agree.
Sufficient minimum contacts exist between Florida and a nonresident defendant if the nonresident defendant, because of his conduct and connection with Florida, should reasonably anticipate being haled into court in Florida. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499, 500 (Fla.1989); World Class Yachts, Inc. v. Murphy, 731 So. 2d 798, 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Peznell v. Doolan, 722 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Hachette Groupe Livre v. 3 Dolphin Indus. Corp., 717 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Further, “[depending upon the facts, a single transaction by the out-of-state defendant may be enough to permit the exercise of jurisdiction in Florida.” Law Offices of Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So. 2d 1382, 1386 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
In the instant case, Kearns involved himself in four real estate transactions for properties located in Dade County, Florida, by agreeing to act as the escrow agent for the deposits made by his client, the purchaser. Based on the fact that the purchase agreements contained liquidated damage clauses, that Kearns is holding the deposits in his escrow account, and that Kearns has refused to tender the deposits held in his escrow account into the court registry, minimum contacts exist between Florida and Kearns such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court in Florida. Therefore, the trial court’s order granting Kearns’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is reversed.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Atlantis Marina & Yacht Club, Inc. v. R & R Holdings, Inc., 766 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…a due process standpoint, certainly someone who engages in a transaction of this type within Florida may reasonably be expected to respond in court here over any claims which may arise from that transaction. See 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc. v. Kearns, 739 So. 2d 156, 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); North Star Intern. Seafood Co., Inc. v. Banner Beef and Seafood Co., Inc., 677 So. 2d 1003, 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Suffolk Federal Credit Union v. Continental Ins. Co., 664 So. 2d at 1155. Atlantis argues, however, that l…
-
Miranda v. Glamour Footwear, 821 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…a is unavailing. As the trial judge concluded, by Miranda’s actions, he should have reasonably anticipated being haled into court in Florida. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499, 500 (Fla.1989); 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc. v. Kearns, 739 So. 2d 156, 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); World Class Yachts, Inc. v. Murphy, 731 So. 2d 798, 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Hachette Groupe Livre v. 3 Dolphin Indus. Corp., 717 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Law Offices of Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So. 2d…
Authorities Cited
- Venetian Salami Co. v. J.S. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989)
- World Class Yachts, Inc. v. Murphy, 731 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- LAW Offs. OF Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
- Arronn Peznell v. Doolan, 722 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Hachette Groupe Livre v. 3 Dolphin Indus. Corp., 717 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Torres v. State, 717 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)