E. E. JEFFCOAT, ALIAS ELVIN E. JEFFCOAT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
L. F. CHAPMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
E. E. JEFFCOAT, ALIAS ELVIN E. JEFFCOAT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
L. F. CHAPMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
108 Fla. 288
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 146 So. 588
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Circuit Court remanding the plaintiff in error to the custody of the defendant in error to await the execution of the judgment and sentence of death should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of J. W, Buchanan v. L. F. Chapman, filed at this Term of the Court, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, Teeeell and Bufoed, J. J., and Johnson, Circuit Judge, concur.
Davis, C. J., disqualified.
Beown, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Baskin, 111 Fla. 667 (Fla. 1933)…lleged to be held by relator. The judgment appealed from should be reversed on the authority of the following cases decided by this Court since the judgment in the lower court was rendered on March 14, 1932. City of Palmetto v. Klemm, 108 Fla. 455, 146 Sou. Rep. 588; State v. Mitchell, 108 Fla. 233, 146 Sou. Rep. 207; Humphreys v. State, 108 Fla. 92, 145 Sou. Rep. 858. In the case of State v. Mitchell, supra, this Court distinguished the previous decisions in State ex rel. East Side Bank v. Holloway, 105 Fla. 6…
-
Langford v. King Lumber & Mfg. Co., 123 Fla. 855 (Fla. 1935)…tions thereto all relating to the interest of J. W. McCoy in the transaction. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, to which this writ of error was prosecuted. This is the second appearance of this case here, 108 Fla. 463, 146 So. 588. The former writ of error was to a directed verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiff’s testimony. It is first contended that the judgment below should be reversed because of irregular conduct of one of the jury [*858] men after retiring…
-
Langford v. King Lumber & Mfg. Co., 132 Fla. 143 (Fla. 1937)…to the seller, which was done. The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below. This controversy has once before been reviewed by this Court and a judgment for defendant on directed verdict reversed. See Langford v. King Lumbr & Mfg. Co., 108 Fla. 463, 146 Sou. Rep. 588. Upon remand and retrial, a verdict by a jury was rendered in defendant’s favor. Upon an earlier consideration thereof by this Court, the judgment entered thereon was affirmed. See: Langford v. King Lumber & Mfg. Co., 123 Fla. 855, 167 Sou. Rep. 817…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence