ANGELA HILL A/K/A ANGELA PERSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 1999-07-07
No. 99-2014
POLEN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
739 So. 2d 634 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Angela Hill, detained on a violation of probation charge since June 1, 1999 without a first appearance or bond hearing, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus. The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal granted the petition, holding that statutory and procedural requirements for prompt appearance before a court following arrest for probation violation cannot be circumvented by judicial docket management.


Holding

A trial court cannot delay a probationer's first court appearance beyond the mandated timeframes. Section 948.06(1) requires the warrant for arrest of a probationer to be returnable 'forthwith' before the court, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.130 entitles an arrested person to be brought before a judicial officer within 24 hours. These requirements cannot be superseded by judicial discretion over docket control.


Headnotes

[1] A warrant for the arrest of a probationer must be returnable forthwith before the court granting probation, which must advise the probationer of the violation charge and…

[2] A person arrested is entitled to be taken before a judicial officer within 24 hours of arrest.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Section 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1997), provides that a warrant for the arrest of a probationer shall be 'returnable forthwith before the court granting such probation or community control.'”

Establishes the statutory mandate for immediate appearance in probation violation cases

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner Angela Hill was arrested on June 1, 1999 for violation of probation and has been held without bond, first appearance, or preliminary hearin…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Angela Hill filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that her detention without bond was illegal because she has been held since her arrest for violation of probation on June 1, 1999 without a first appearance, bond or preliminary hearing. Petitioner advised that the presiding judge would not entertain a hearing in her case until July 6, 1999 at the earliest. This court already has granted this petition by order, but now issues this opinion to explain its rationale for doing so.

Section 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1997), provides that a warrant for the arrest of a probationer shall be “returnable forthwith before the court granting such probation or community control.” The court is charged at this appearance with advising the probationer brought before it of the charge of violation, and proceeding accordingly. As well, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.130 entitles a person arrested to be taken before a judicial officer within 24 hours of arrest. Here, petitioner is being held more than four weeks before having her first court appearance on the charge of violation of probation.

The state has argued that trial courts have discretion to control their dockets, and while that may be true as a general principle, it does not supplant the rights of defendants to be brought to court forthwith following, an arrest for violation of probation, particularly when a statute and rule of criminal procedure expressly mandate that the appearance be forthwith or within 24 hours. We find the cases cited by state to be factually distinguishable. For example, in State v. Griffith, 331 So. 2d 313 (Fla.1976), the defendant was arraigned and did not demand a preliminary hearing. In Bennington v. Thornton, 370 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), this court did not address the right to first appearance or arraignment for defendants charged with violation of probation.

We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and direct the court to bring petitioner before it forthwith, if it has not done so already in compliance with this court’s previously released order. PETITION GRANTED.

POLEN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw