D.A.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Crepage v. City OF Lauderhill, 774 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …om various appellate court decisions interpreting the statute. 588 So. 2d at 966. The court held that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure would control the procedural aspects of forfeiture proceedings unless otherwise provided. Id.; Golon v. Jenne, 739 So. 2d 659, 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Thus, the determination of what constitutes reasonable notice is governed by the due process clause, as well as by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090(d). Rule 1.090(d) provides that notice of a hearing “be served a reas…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Alvaro Alvarez v. City OF Hialeah, 900 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …ourteenth Amendments”).3 Therefore, prior to mak [*766] ing a determination of whether there is a nexus between the currency and elicit drug activities, the trial court here had to address the legality of the stop of the vehicle. See Golon v. Jenne, 739 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Indialantic Police Dep’t. v. Zimmerman, 677 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Based upon our de novo review of the evidence adduced at the adversarial preliminary hearing below, we disagree with the trial court’s determination t…
• In re Forfeiture OF: 1999 Dodge Intrepid v. Sheriff Grady Judd, 934 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …the claimants raised a Fourth Amendment challenge to the stop of the vehicle, that issue must be addressed first and independently of the question of whether there is a nexus between the seized currency and unlawful drug activity.”); Golon v. Jenne, 739 So. 2d 659, 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“[L]ong-standing precedent provides that evidence derived from a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment must be excluded at a hearing determining whether the government has probable cause for forfeiture.”); Indialantic…

Authorities Cited

• State v. M.C., 666 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 1995)