THEODORE MACARTHUR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THEODORE MACARTHUR, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
739 So. 2d 681
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Christopher v. State, 489 So. 2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986)(“It is well established that a court may refuse to address those issues contained in a motion for post-conviction relief that were raised on direct appeal or could have been raised on direct appeal”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1077, 108 S.Ct. 1057, 98 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1988); Duncan v. State, 728 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); MacArthur v. State, 668 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Anderson v. State, 467 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding that trial counsel is not deemed ineffective bécause of strategic decisions made during trial).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Tortoise Island Cmtys., Inc. v. The Moorings Ass'n, Inc., 489 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1986)
- Anderson v. State, 467 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Duncan v. State, 728 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Mehar v. C & P Tel. Co. of Md., 484 U.S. 1077 (U.S. 1988)
- Aceves-Rosales v. United States, 484 U.S. 1077 (U.S. 1988)
- Lorber v. NEW Deal Meat & Poultry, Inc., 668 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- MacARTHUR v. State, 668 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)