ARGADYS T. IGLESIAS, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1999-09-08
Nos. 98-789
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
739 So. 2d 707 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Department of Business and Professional Regulations’s order disciplining Iglesias. The record demonstrates that the administrative law judge abused his discretion in denying Iglesias’s motion for continuance to permit the appearance of his newly-retained counsel. See City of Palm Bay v. State, Dept. of Transp., 588 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (standard of review is abuse of discretion). Iglesias voiced his concerns about going forward without counsel as he was ill-equipped to argue and had language difficulties. This ruling denied Iglesias the opportunity to adequately present his case.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kens Carter Jeancharles v. Dept. of Revenue, 273 So. 3d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
    …er. That order followed, finding $7,155 due in retroactive support. Discussion When an ALJ denies a litigant’s request for a continuance, this court’s standard of review is abuse of discretion. Iglesias v. Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 739 So. 2d 707, 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). While the rule of judicial discretion in granting or denying motions for continuance maintains its vitality, strict adherence to that rule may sometimes bring about unfair and unjust results. Hence, as a component of…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw