BOBBY MCMILLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
SUNCOAST SCHOOLS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Issue Of Fact cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Bobby McMillan challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Suncoast Schools Federal Credit Union (“Suncoast”) and entry of a final judgment of foreclosure on his deceased mother’s home. We affirm the trial court’s summary judgment because McMillan failed to show any issue of fact, by affidavit or other evidence, to counter Sun-coast’s motion. See Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, 175 So. 2d 780, 782 (Fla.1965); Pelz v. City of Clearwater, 568 So. 2d 949, 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
We note that after the trial court entered the final judgment, Suncoast discovered that it had failed to include two additional heirs in the foreclosure and discovered a mistake in the mortgage loan amounts stated in the affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment. Consequently, Suncoast filed a motion which is now pending in the trial court to set aside the Final Judgment of Foreclosure, cancel the foreclosure sale, and amend the foreclosure complaint to correct the errors.
We affirm the summary judgment as to McMillan and remand to the trial court to correct the clerical error in the amount owed and for further proceedings on the foreclosure action.
PATTERSON, C.J., and PARKER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC, 112 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 2013)…courts have recognized that pursuant to the rule stated in Tanenbaum, a written contract falling within the Statute of Frauds cannot be orally modified through the operation of promissory estoppel. In Wharfside at Boca Pointe, Inc. v. Superior Bank, 741 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), for example, the parties executed a written contract for the sale of an interest in a real estate project for $3.1 million. Id. at 543. Closing failed to occur on time, and the seller assigned its interest in the project to anot…
-
Lynkus Commc'ns, Inc. v. Webmd Corp., 965 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…h of an oral contract” within the operation of the statute of frauds. Elsberry v. Sexton, 61 Fla. 162, 54 So. 592, 593 (1911); see also Winters v. Alanco, Inc., 435 So. 2d 326, 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wharfside at Boca Pointe, Inc. v. Superior Bank, 741 So. 2d 542, 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Collier v. Brooks, 632 So. 2d 149, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Dwight v. Tobin, 947 F. 2d 455, 459 (11th Cir.1991). Accordingly, LynkUs succeeds on none of the broad grounds it urges for taking the agreement at issue out of t…
-
DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC, 31 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…at fundamental principle of justice.” Imperator Realty Co. v. Tull, 228 N.Y. 447, 127 N.E. 263, 266 (1920) (Cardozo, J., concurring) (citations omitted).3 DK Arena relies primarily on our decision in Wharfside at Boca Pointe, Inc. v. Superior Bank, 741 So. 2d 542, 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), which states the general rule that an “agreement that is required by the statute of frauds to be in writing cannot be orally modified.” Wharfside involved a written contract for the purchase of an interest in a commercial r…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Holland Paving Co., Inc. v. Dann, 175 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1965)
- Harvey Bldg., Inc. v. Ocie M. Haley, 175 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1965)
- Pelz v. City OF Clearwater, 568 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)