STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
FREDERICK C. WILSON, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
FREDERICK C. WILSON, APPELLEE
741 So. 2d 546
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Wise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D657, — So. 2d -, 1999 WL 123568 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar.10, 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with McKnight v. State, 727 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Woods v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); and Speed v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1017, 732 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
DELL, GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clark v. State, 881 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…ssue took place. . For instance, one isolated comment does not entitle a defendant to a mistrial, especially when an appropriate curative instruction is given by a trial judge. See, e.g., Gudinas v. State, 693 So. 2d 953 (Fla.1997); James v. State, 741 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The denial of a mistrial is also not error where the inadvertent remark does not become a focus of the trial or is not directly material to disputed issues. Cole v. State, 701 So. 2d 845 (Fla.1997). Such inappropriate comments a…
-
Washington v. State, 766 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…ed the victim to tell her what had happened. Finally, the trial court gave a curative instruction, supplied by appellant. Under these facts, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for mistrial. See James v. State, 741 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA1999). Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for lewd assault on a child under the age of sixteen, pursuant to section 800.04(1), Florida Statutes (1997). AFFIRMED. DELL, STONE and POLEN, JJ. concur.…
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Medina, 300 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)…n response, State Farm objected to the questions as argumentative and the court sustained the objections. Accordingly, while the comment may well have been blurted out in anger, the comment was elicited by Plaintiff’s attorney. See James v. State, 741 So. 2d 546, 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). b) Comment impugning Plaintiff’s medical expert As the second ground, the trial court found that the defense expert improperly commented on Plaintiff’s medical expert’s credibility and willfully violated the court’s in li…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Speed v. State, 732 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- McKNIGHT v. State, 727 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)