LORENZO TATUM, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LORENZO TATUM, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
741 So. 2d 1266
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Lorenzo Tatum appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that he was a juvenile at the time he pled guilty to second degree murder and other crimes in 1993, and contends that his sentence is illegal because the sentencing court did not make findings regarding the necessity of adult sanctions. See § 39.059(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reject that claim on authority of Summers v. State, 684 So. 2d 729 (Fla.1996). We find no merit to appellant’s remaining points and reject them without discussion.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tatum v. State, 27 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…dult sanctions. See § 39.059(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reject that claim on authority of Summers v. State, 684 So. 2d 729 (Fla.1996). We find no merit to appellant’s remaining points and reject them without discussion. Affirmed. Tatum v. State, 741 So. 2d 1266, 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (emphasis added). Undeterred, in June of 2005, Tatum filed yet another Rule 3.800 motion. This motion, like the last, claimed (1) that Tatum’s second degree murder conviction should not have been “enhanced” for use of a fir…
Authorities Cited
- Summers v. State, 684 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1996)