PETER MARKLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PETER MARKLAND, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
742 So. 2d 325
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s claims under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 are time-barred. See id. R. 3.850(b). None of appellant’s claims qualify under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to the double jeopardy claims, see Novaton v. State 634 So. 2d 607 (Fla.1994). As to the claims based on State v. Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1995), see State v. Woodley, 695 So. 2d 297, 298 (Fla.1997) (stating that the decision in Gray is not retroactive).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Markland v. State, 197 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…3d DCA 2009); Markland v. State, 971 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Markland v. State, 917 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Markland v. State, 905 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Markland v. State, 821 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Markland v. State, 742 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); and Markland v. State, 642 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Collin Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1995)
- Novaton v. State, 634 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 1994)
- State v. Woodley, 695 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 1997)