CINDY HOFFMAN HOAG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CINDY HOFFMAN HOAG, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
742 So. 2d 348
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Cindy Hoffman Hoag appeals the summary denial of her request for jail credit, which the trial court treated as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because her motion failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hoag’s ability to file a proper rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court which alleges that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. See Spivey v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1681, 737 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v. State, 728 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
FULMER, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur. i
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1998)
- Crompton v. State, 728 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Spivey v. State, 737 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Gulfside Props. Corp. v. Chapman Corp., 737 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)