CLARENCE G. BOUIS, HATTIE E. BOUIS, AND FLORIDA FRUIT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
TRUSTEN B. DRAKE, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLEE
CLARENCE G. BOUIS, HATTIE E. BOUIS, AND FLORIDA FRUIT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
TRUSTEN B. DRAKE, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLEE
90 Fla. 824
Florida Supreme Court (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 31 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the-court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered añd adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (31 total)
-
Cunningham v. Standard Guar. Ins. Co., 630 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1994)…c. v. Dania Bank, 252 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1971); Steele v. A.D.H. Bldg. Contractors, Inc., 174 So. 2d 16 (Fla.1965); Welch v. Gray Moss Bondholders Corp., 128 Fla. 722, 175 So. 529 (1937); Esch v. Forster, 123 Fla. 905, 168 So. 229 (1936); Smüh v. Smith, 90 Fla. 824, 107 So. 257 (1925). In an arrangement such as the one in the instant case, trying the bad-faith claim before the underlying negligence action would result in a foil release of the insured if no bad faith were found, thereby avoiding a time consumin…
-
Esch v. Davis Forster, 123 Fla. 905 (Fla. 1936)…pecially where the stipulation has been acted upon so that the parties cannot be placed in statu quo. 20 Ency. of Pleading and Practice, page 662, and 25 R. G. L. 1095, et seq.’’ See, also, Mugge v. Jackson, 50 Fla. 235, 39 So. 157; Smith v. Smith, 90 Fla. 824, 107 So. 257; Penney, et al., v. First Trust & Savings Bank, 102 Fla. 185, 135 So. 805. As was Said by Mr. Chief Justice Brown, in Smith v. Smith, supra: “The making of such stipulations as the one here involved should be encouraged rather than di…
-
Orr v. Morrison B. Orr, 141 Fla. 112 (Fla. 1939)…ec. 4986, C. G. L., 1927) the wife “may in the bill for divorce, or by petition, claim alimony and suit money * * The term “suit money” is broad enough to include attorneys’ fees and all costs of the divorce proceeding pendente life. Smith v. Smith, 90 Fla. 824, 107 South. Rep. 257. That a citation for contempt would issue for a wanton or willful failure to comply with an interlocutory order allowing attorneys’ fees is apparent. See 17 Am. Jur. 460, supra. In principle, there is no difference between a fl…
Previewing 3 of 31 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence