AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 1593, APPELLANT,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1999-08-25
No. 98-2848
Barfield, C.J., Booth, J., Miner, J.
742 So. 2d 380 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Public sector employers are not required to collectively bargain over subcontracting decisions, which constitute a management prerogative distinct from private sector mandatory bargaining obligations.


Holding

Public sector employers have no duty to collectively bargain over the right to subcontract, as subcontracting is a management prerogative under Florida law.


Headnotes

[1] Public sector employers are not required to collectively bargain over subcontracting decisions, which constitute a management prerogative distinguishable from private sec…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1593 challenged the Public Employees Relations Commission's decision that public employers need not bargain collective…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal and cross-appeal from a final order of the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC). We affirm the cross-appeal without comment. On appeal, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1593, Appellant, challenges PERC’s decision that public employers do not have to collectively bargain over the right to subcontract. Finding no error in PERC’s decision, we affirm. Appellant relies on the private sector model found in Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 85 S.Ct. 398, 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964), where the United States Supreme Court held that subcontracting is a mandatory subject of collective bargaining. We distinguish the instant case from Fibreboard on the basis that private sector employers are quite different from public sector employers. The Florida Supreme Court has recognized that there are critical distinctions between private and public sector bargaining. State v. Florida Police Benevolent Assoc., Inc., 613 So. 2d 415 (Fla.1992).

We, therefore, agree with PERC’s interpretation of section 447.209, Florida Statutes, that the right to subcontract is a management prerogative which is not a subject of mandatory collective bargaining, and affirm the order below.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and MINER, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw