JERRY CAUBLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-09-10
No. 98-02620
GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
742 So. 2d 422 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court affirmed Jerry Cauble's sentences for DUI manslaughter and related offenses. The court clarified that while the incarcerative portion of a probationary split sentence is limited by sentencing guidelines, the total sanction is not, unless specific statutory conditions are met.


Holding

No, the total duration of a probationary split sentence is not limited by sentencing guidelines in such circumstances. Only the incarcerative portion of the sentence is limited by the guidelines.


Headnotes

[1] A probationary split sentence is not limited to the recommended guidelines sentence when the recommended guidelines sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum sentenc…

[2] The total sanction for a probationary split sentence shall not exceed the term provided by general law or the guidelines recommended sentence where the provisions of sect…

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“In general, the guidelines only limit the prison term to be imposed.”

Establishes the general rule regarding the limitation of sentencing guidelines.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Jerry Cauble was convicted of DUI manslaughter, DUI with bodily injury, and leaving the scene of an accident. He received a twenty-year probationary s…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, Jerry Cauble, challenges the propriety of his sentences, which were imposed after remand, for DUI manslaughter, DUI with bodily injury, and leaving the scene of an accident involving injury and/or death. See Cauble v. State, 23 Fla.

L. Weekly D39, — So. 2d -, 1997 WL 912913 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec.19, 1997)(afftrming convictions, but reversing upward departure sentence and remanding for resentencing). Though Cauble raises three issues, we address only his challenge to the ultimate duration of his twenty-year probationary split sentence, to which the State improperly concedes error. “In general, the guidelines only limit the prison term to be imposed.” Ortiz v. State, 696 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19); § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). If a probationary split sentence is imposed, however, “[t]he total sanction ... shall not exceed the term provided by general law or the guidelines recommended sentence where the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19).

Section 921.001(5) applies only if the recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum sentence. In Cauble’s case, he was convicted of one second-degree felony, the statutory maximum being fifteen years, see section 775.082(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1997), and two third-degree felonies, the statutory maximum on each of those being five years, see section 775.082(3)(d).

Cauble’s statutory maximum exposure was thus twenty-five years, if consecutive sentences were to be imposed. Since his recommended guidelines sentence was 17.9 years, section 921.001(5) did not apply. Cauble’s probationary split sentence was therefore not limited to the recommended guidelines sentence, as, under the circumstances herein, the .general rule applied, meaning that only the incarcerative portion of the probationary split sentence was limited to the recommended guidelines sentence. Since the incarcerative portion of Cauble’s sentence was fifteen years, it was well within the guidelines.

Affirmed.

GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw