WAYNE DAVID CALLAHAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WAYNE DAVID CALLAHAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
743 So. 2d 34
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979); Miller v. State, 697 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Stone v. State, 688 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
JOANOS, MINER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. Stidham, 19 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…Williams Scotsman, Inc., 924 So. 2d 37, 39 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). The trial court has broad discretion to extend the time for service even when good cause for failing to meet the 120-day deadline has not been shown. Bacchi v. Manna of Hernando, Inc., 743 So. 2d 34, 34 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). However, even when there has been no showing of good cause or excusable neglect and the statute of limitations has run, discretion should be exercised in favor of allowing the plaintiff [*1158] an extension to accomplish ser…
-
Regions Bank v. Buoncervello, 220 So. 3d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…trial court enjoys “broad discretion to extend the time for service even when good cause for failing to meet the 120-day deadline has not been shown.” Roberts v. Stidham, 19 So. 3d 1155, 1157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (citing Bacchi v. Manna of Hernando, 743 So. 2d 34, 34 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)). When the statute of limitations has run, preventing refiling of the complaint, trial courts should exercise discretion in favor of extending the service deadline: [I]f such a dismissal order is entered after the expiration…
Authorities Cited
- Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Stone v. State, 688 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Miller v. State, 697 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)