IRENE WALL AND JAMES WALL, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
PALM BEACH COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A county cannot waive the statutory notice requirement for the Department of Insurance, and failure to provide such notice can be raised at any time.
Appellants sued Palm Beach County for negligence. The county moved for summary judgment, arguing appellants failed to provide statutory notice of inte…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Defenses cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Summary judgment was entered in favor of Palm Beach County on appellants’ suit for negligence on the ground that appellants had failed to provide the statutory notice of intent to sue to the Department of Insurance (“Department”) pursuant to section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1997). Appellants complain that because the county neglected to state its defense of lack of notice to the Department in specific terms pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.120(c), it waived any reliance thereon. While the county may waive the requirement of notice to itself, an agency may not waive notice to the Department. Cf. Menendez v. North Broward Hosp. Dist., 515 So. 2d 1377, 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (“Menendez I”), approved, 537 So. 2d 89 (Fla.1988) (“Menen-dez II ”)• Moreover, because notice to the Department of Insurance as well as the agency is essential to state a cause of action, the failure to give notice may be raised by motion at any time prior to trial. See Menendez II, 537 So. 2d at 91.
Appellant cites Gardner v. Broward County, 631 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), for the proposition that notice can be waived by the county. This case is distinguishable. In Gardner, we held that the county waived the statutory notice requirement where it waited until trial to raise the issue. See id. at 320. However, that case involved the county’s ability to waive notice to itself, not to the Department of Insurance. See id. at 319. We noted in Menendez I, 515 So. 2d at 1379, that although the hospital may have waived its right to notice by waiting four years to raise the issue, there was no authority allowing the hospital to waive notice to the Department.
The motion for summary judgment and uncontradicted affidavits filed by the county show that no notice was given to the Department. Therefore, summary judgment was appropriate.
Affirmed.
WARNER, C.J., SHAHOOD, J., and CHAVIES, MICHAEL B., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Broward Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Joseph, 756 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…gainst a governmental agency where the Department of Insurance is not made a party, the statutory requirement of notice to the Department contained in section 768.28(6) cannot be waived by conduct of the defending agency); Wall v. Palm Beach County, 743 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(affirming a summary judgment in favor of the county on the grounds of failure of the claimant to give notice of intent to sue to the Department of Insurance pursuant to section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1997)). Accordingly, w…
-
Lederer v. Orlando Utils. Comm'n, 981 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…DCA 2003) (finding that summary judgment is appropriate when plaintiff failed to provide required notice within three-year deadline as notice to Department is essential condition precedent to maintaining cause of action); Wall v. Palm Beach County, 743 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (affirming summary judgment in favor of county on grounds that claimant failed to give notice of intent to sue Department pursuant to section 768.28(6)). AFFIRMED. LAWSON, J., concurs. TORPY, J., dissents, with opinion. . Spe…
-
Calero v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 787 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…nt of Insurance, within 3 years after such claim accrues .... (emphasis added) The law is clear that while the county may waive the notice requirement to itself, it may not waive notice to the Department of Insurance. See Wall v. Palm Beach County, 743 So. 2d 44, 44-45 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In this case, it is undisputed that the Department of Insurance did not receive notice of the wife’s claim within the applicable three-year time period. Thus, the wife’s consortium claim is barred as a matter of law. See…
Authorities Cited
- Menendez v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 537 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1988)
- Gardner v. Broward Cnty., 631 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Menendez v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 515 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)