SAVERIO CERRA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1999-10-25
No. 99-1567
ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
743 So. 2d 176 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Baker v. State, 714 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mena v. J.I.L. Constr. Grp. Corp., 79 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …"insuring and keeping insured the payment of such compensation with any stock company or mutual company [*225] or association or exchange, authorized to do business in the state." § 440.38(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); Limerock Indus., Inc. v. Pridgeon, 743 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We therefore reject Mena’s argument that the term imposes an automatic duty to actually pay benefits wherever it is used in the statute.…
  • VMS, Inc. v. Elvis Alfonso, 147 So. 3d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
    …ay benefits,” but only requires that payment be insured “with any stock company or mutual company or association or exchange, authorized to do business in the state” (quoting § 440.38, Fla. Stat. (2004))); see also Limerock Indus., Inc. v. Pridgeon, 743 So. 2d 176, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (finding section 440.38’s requirement that the employer “secure payment of compensation” was satisfied where the employer “secur[ed] a policy of workers’ compensation insurance that covered the injured employee”). Because s…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw