MICHAEL HAYNECZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unconstitutional Statute cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals his guilty pleas and sentences for burglary and possession of burglary tools. We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the defendant’s sentences and remand for re-sentencing.
The defendant asserts the trial court improperly enhanced his sentences under the Criminal Street Gang Prevention Act, section 874.04, Florida Statutes (1997). The Florida Supreme Court has recently declared section 874.04 violates substantive due process, thereby rendering it unconstitutional. See State v. O.C., Case No. 94,-513, — So. 2d -, 1999 WL 731661 (Fla. Sept. 16, 1999). Because the trial court enhanced the defendant’s sentences pursuant to section 874.04, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
GUNTHER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seburt Nelson Connor v. State, 803 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2001)…ation to cases final as of the date this opinion is released. . But see Shannon v. State, 753 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Morris v. State, 749 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); A.J.M. v. State, 746 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); State v. Jackson, 744 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). . Dr. Levy, Dr. Herrera, Dr. Jacobson, and Dr. Ansley only testified at one or both of the competency hearings and did not testify during the penalty phase.…
-
Jenkins v. State, 96 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…identification[.]” State v. Cromartie, 419 So. 2d 757, 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). See Perez v. State, 648 So. 2d 715, 719 (Fla.1995). But show-ups are not invalid “unless the police aggravate the suggestiveness of the confrontation,” State v. Jackson, 744 So. 2d 545, 548 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), or the procedure “give[s] rise to [a] substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification under the totality of circumstances.” Cromartie, 419 So. 2d at 759. Nothing in the record indicates that the police did anything…
-
Guzman-Aviles v. State, 226 So. 3d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification given the totality of the circumstances. See Blanco v. State, 452 So. 2d 520, 524 (Fla. 1984), receded from on other grounds by Puglisi v. State, 112 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. 2013); State v. Jackson, 744 So. 2d 545, 548 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). The factors to be considered in evaluating the likelihood of misidentification include: (1) “the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime”; (2) “the witness’ degree of attention”; (3) “the ac…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence