KENNETH M. PERRYMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Kenneth Perryman pled no contest to felony charges for driving with a suspended license, but the court held that once declared a habitual traffic offender under Florida law, he could only be charged under the misdemeanor provision for his next offense, not the felony provision. The court reversed and remanded to dismiss the felony charges.
Once a defendant has been declared a habitual traffic offender under § 322.264, § 322.34(1) does not apply to that defendant. Instead, § 322.34(2) applies exclusively, which provides that a first conviction is a misdemeanor of the first degree and only a second or subsequent conviction is a felony.
[1] A person declared a habitual traffic offender under section 322.264, Florida Statutes, cannot be charged under section 322.34(1), Florida Statutes, for driving with a sus…
[2] A defendant declared a habitual traffic offender may only be charged under section 322.34(2) for driving with a revoked license.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The plain language of section 322.34, Florida Statutes (1995), operates to preclude the state from charging a defendant, once declared a habitual traffic offender under section 322.264, with a felony for his next charge under this statute.”
Establishes the core holding that habitual traffic offenders are excluded from felony charges under the first offense driving with suspended license statute.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePerryman was declared a habitual traffic offender under Florida Statute § 322.264. He was subsequently charged with two felony counts of driving while…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Driving While License Suspended Or Revoked cases and more on FLexlaw
[*1032] POLEN, Judge.
Kenneth Perryman pled no contest to two charges of felony “driving while license suspended or revoked” under section 322.34(1), Florida Statutes, preserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motions to dismiss the charges. The defendant had already been declared a habitual traffic offender under section 322.264, and contends that, on his next offense, he may only be charged with a misdemeanor under section 322.34(2)(a). We agree.
The plain language of section 322.34, Florida Statutes (1995), operates to preclude the state from charging a defendant, once declared a habitual traffic offender under section 322.264, with a felony for his next charge under this statute. The statute states, in pertinent part:
(1) Any person whose driver’s license or driving privilege has been canceled, suspended, or revoked as provided by law, except persons defined, in s. 322.264, 1 and who drives any motor vehicle upon the highways of this state while such license or privilege is canceled, suspended, or revoked, upon:
(a) A first conviction is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) A second conviction is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(c) A third or subsequent conviction is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) Any person whose driver’s license has been revoked pursuant to s. 322.264 (habitual offender) and who drives any motor vehicle upon the highways of this state while such license is revoked upon:
(a) A first conviction is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) A second or subsequent conviction is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
§ 322.34, Fla. Stat. (1995) (emphasis added). Under the plain meaning of the statute, section 322.34(1) is not applicable to a defendant once having been found a section 322.264 habitual traffic offender. See Capers v. State, 678 So. 2d 330, 332 (Fla.1996) (citations omitted), (cited in State v. Harvey, 693 So. 2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that, under standard rules of construction, the plain meaning of the statute governs review)). Therefore, as the state properly concedes, the court should have granted the motions to dismiss. See Harvey, 693 So. 2d at 1011 (holding that, where a defendant has been declared as a habitual traffic offender, he can be charged only under section 322.34(2)(a), Florida Statutes).
REVERSED AND REMANDED TO TRIAL COURT TO DISMISS THE CHARGES AGAINST APPELLANT THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL.
GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. . Section 322.264, Florida Statutes (1995) reads, in pertinent part:
A "habitual traffic offender” is any person whose record, as maintained by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, shows that such person has accumulated the specified number of convictions for offenses described in subsection (1) or subsection (2) within a 5-year period.... Any violation of any federal law, any law of another state or country, or any valid ordinance of a municipality or county of another state similar to a statutory prohibition specified in subsection (1) or subsection (2) shall be counted as a violation of such prohibition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Capers v. State, 678 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1996)
- State v. Oberlin D. Harvey, 693 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)