MICHAEL WAYNE REED, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court may suspend or revoke a driver's license based on the totality of circumstances, even if the defendant is acquitted of charges directly related to a death.
The defendant was involved in a fatal automobile accident and charged with manslaughter and vehicular homicide, but was convicted of the lesser offens…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Discretion cases and more on FLexlaw
STONE, J.
We affirm Reed’s sentence which includes a provision for the permanent suspension of his driver’s license pursuant to section 316.655(2), Florida Statutes.
Reed was involved in a fatal automobile accident and was charged with manslaughter and vehicular homicide. He was found guilty of reckless driving, a lesser-included offense of vehicular homicide. It is undisputed that the victim died at the scene.
Section 316.655(2) provides in pertinent part:
Drivers convicted of a violation of any offense prohibited by this chapter or any other law of this state regulating motor vehicles may have their driving privileges revoked or suspended by the court if the court finds such revocation or suspension warranted by the totality of the circumstances.... In determining whether suspension or revocation is appropriate, the court shall consider all pertinent factors, including, but not limited to, such factors as the extent and nature of the driver’s violation of this chapter, the number of persons killed or injured as the result of the driver’s violation of this chapter, and the extent of any property damage resulting from the driver’s violation of this chapter. § 316.655(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996).
We recognize that a trial court may not impose punishment for an act with regard to which the defendant was acquitted. Here, however, although Reed was not convicted of manslaughter or vehicular homicide, the trial court had discretion to consider the totality of the circumstances, including the fact that a death occurred, in deciding whether to revoke or suspend . Reed’s driving privileges. Therefore, we find that the trial judge properly suspended Reed’s driver’s license.
KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stoletz v. State, 875 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2004)…se which [*577] was a violation of a “law of this state regulating motor vehicles,” the trial judge did not err in considering the totality of the circumstances when permanently revoking Stoletz’s license under section 316.655(2). See Reed v. State, 744 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (finding the trial court properly considered the totality of circumstances, including the fact that a death occurred, in permanently revoking a defendant’s license pursuant to section 316.655(2) after his conviction for reckless…