RICKY LAMAR LEWIS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of mandamus, Ricky Lamar Lewis seeks an order compelling the Circuit Court of Santa Rosa County to rule on two pending motions in its Case No. 91-592-CFA. The first, entitled “Response to Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Compel Production of Documents,” was filed by Lewis in June 1997, and the second, entitled “Judgment on the Pleadings and Notice of Default for Failure to Prosecute,” was filed in June 1998. In response to an order of this court, the state advises that it can show no cause why mandamus relief should not be granted. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is granted, and the circuit court is directed to enter an order within 30 days disposing of the above-described motions.
WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lewis v. State, 764 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…of Lewis’ claim that the record in his direct appeal to this court was incomplete or inaccurate. Petitioner places particular reliance on his petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto in a case where relief was granted, Lewis v. State, 744 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). There we held that Lewis was entitled to have the trial court rule on certain motions which were pending in his postconviction claim for relief. Petitioner misunderstands the response in that case and our ruling. The responden…