ROBERT O. SIMMONS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT O. SIMMONS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
745 So. 2d 405
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See, e.g., Daniels v. State, 568 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Alexander v. State, 553 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and ALLEN, JJ. CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Magnetic Imaging Sys. v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 847 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…section 627.736(5); and (2) Magnetic had incurred no fees between the time arbitration was ordered and the time payment was tendered. For the following reasons, we disagree and reverse. In Central Magnetic Imaging v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 745 So. 2d 405, 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), this court held that an insurer’s payment of PIP benefits demanded by a medical provider assignee following commencement of arbitration constituted a settlement which “is equivalent to a confession of judgment,” entitling th…
Authorities Cited
- PIA Psychiatric Hosps., Inc. v. State, 568 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Alexander v. State, 553 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- Melvin v. State, 553 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)