BRIAN LEE BLAIR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revocation Of Community Control cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from a revocation of appellant’s community control and resentencing, appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that he had violated standard condition seven of his community control. Appellant claims that insufficient evidence was presented to prove that particular violation. In accordance with the dictates of Alston v. State, 646 So. 2d 184 (Fla.1994), we must reverse.
While we must reverse, we note, as did the supreme court in Alston, that the single admitted instance of unlawful drug use in this case would constitute sufficient evidence that appellant violated standard condition five of his community control which required him to “live without violating the law.” See id. at 185. We, therefore, advise the state that nothing in our opinion today precludes it from initiating new revocation proceedings against appellant, pri-or to the expiration of his community control, based on a properly charged violation of standard condition five. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
JOANOS, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ingram v. State, 928 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…nd the search of the surrounding space in the passenger compartment were illegal, but also that he had standing to object to the seizure and search. See Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980); State v. Bostick, 745 So. 2d 496, 497 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).. “Fourth Amendment rights are personal rights which, like some other constitutional rights, may not be vicariously asserted.” See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 133-34, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978) (quoting Brown v…
-
Hawk v. State, 848 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…W. and PALMER, JJ., concur. . "A defendant who moves to suppress evidence on the ground that it was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment has the burden of establishing that he or she has standing to object to the seizure.” State v. Bostick, 745 So. 2d 496, 497 (Fla. 1st DCA [*477] 1999) (citing Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960); State v. Singleton, 595 So. 2d 44 (Fla.1992)). The issue of stand…
-
Hendley v. State, 58 So. 3d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…ot authorized to drive); Hicks, 929 So. 2d at 16-19 (no reasonable expectation of privacy in a stolen computer); State v. Lennon, 963 So. 2d 765, 769-70 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (no expectation of privacy in a stolen jet ski or trailer); State v. Bostick, 745 So. 2d 496, 497 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (no standing to challenge seizure of items obtained from a stolen car); Tongue v. State, 544 So. 2d 1173, 1175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (no legitimate expectation of privacy in a stolen vehicle). “The Fourth Amendment does not pr…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Alston v. State, 646 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1994)