LAWRENCE LERAY MORGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LAWRENCE LERAY MORGAN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
745 So. 2d 527
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dufour v. State, 495 So. 2d 154 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1101, 107 S.Ct. 1332, 94 L.Ed.2d 183 (1987); Batista v. State, 685 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), review denied, 695 So. 2d 698 (Fla.1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCABE, 763 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…463 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)). The same principle applies whether the attorney’s fee award is post-judgment or a discovery sanction. Nordyne, Inc. v. Florida Mobile Home Supply, Inc., 625 So. 2d 1283, 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Weiss v. Rachlin and Cohen, 745 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Generally, when the record on appeal is devoid of competent substantial evidence to support the attorney’s fee award, the appellate court will reverse the award without remand for additional evi-dentiary findings. Rodriguez, 72…
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kendrick, 780 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…d of fees to Kendrick, the result of the trial court’s faulty analysis and not supported by substantial competent evidence, likewise cannot stand. See Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe, 763 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Weiss v. Rachlin and Cohen, 745 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, the petition sought is granted, the orders under review are quashed and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing on items for which privilege is claimed. . State Farm argues that Kendrick's claim has been sa…
Authorities Cited
- Dufour v. State, 495 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1986)
- Henkel v. United States, 479 U.S. 1101 (U.S. 1987)
- Parker v. Illinois, 479 U.S. 1101 (U.S. 1987)
- Batista v. State, 685 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)