REEF INVESTMENTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS E. VALLE, DECEASED, MARIE A. VALLE, AN UNREMARRIED WIDOW, MICHAEL BOOROM AND RAMY BOOROM, HIS WIFE, AND CITY CREDIT UNION OF FORT LAUDERDALE, THEIR HEIRS, DEVISEES, LEGATEES AND GRANTEES AND ANYONE CLAIMING BY, THROUGH AND UNDER THE NAMED DEFENDANTS, APPELLEES
REEF INVESTMENTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
THOMAS E. VALLE, DECEASED, MARIE A. VALLE, AN UNREMARRIED WIDOW, MICHAEL BOOROM AND RAMY BOOROM, HIS WIFE, AND CITY CREDIT UNION OF FORT LAUDERDALE, THEIR HEIRS, DEVISEES, LEGATEES AND GRANTEES AND ANYONE CLAIMING BY, THROUGH AND UNDER THE NAMED DEFENDANTS, APPELLEES
745 So. 2d 544
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the Final Judgment Denying Foreclosure. The trial court correctly applied the doctrine of laches in favor of appellees. See Travis Co. v. Mayes, 160 Fla. 375, 36 So. 2d 264 (1948); Ratner v. Miami Beach First Nat’l Bank, 368 So. 2d 1326, 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Briggs v. Estate of Geelhoed ex rel. Johnson, 543 So. 2d 332, 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED.
WARNER, C.J., DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palmer v. State, 775 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…co-counsel in order to disqualify Judge Goldstein. Although petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, asking us to order that the trial court permit Mr. Levine’s appearance, we conclude that the proper remedy is a writ of certiorari. Saud v. Arzumanian, 745 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (an order disqualifying a party’s counsel is reviewable by certiorari); Wells v. Grau, 744 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Robinson v. State, 750 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We accordingly treat this petition as a petition for…
-
Legion Ins. Co. v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 807 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…resenting Legion. Due to the seriousness of the error, which amounted to denying Legion its choice of counsel, we grant the petition and vacate the order. See, e.g., Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Saud v. Arzumanian, 745 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). See also Therriault v. Berghmans, 788 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (stating that disqualification of one’s counsel is an extraordinary [*692] remedy that should be resorted to only sparingly). Petition granted and order quash…
Authorities Cited
- THE Travis Co. v. Tully Mayes and Mary LOU Mayes, 160 Fla. 375 (Fla. 1948)
- Briggs v. The Est. OF Pauline Geelhoed, 543 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Ratner v. Miami Beach First Nat'l Bank, 368 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)