ROBERT SEABROOKS AND AVA SEABROOKS, APPELLANTS,
v.
WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed in part and remanded a trial court's order denying expert witness costs, holding that reasonable expert witness fees for trial testimony and preparation time must be taxed as costs under Florida law.
Reasonable expert witness fees for trial testimony and preparation time must be taxed as costs under § 92.231(2), Fla. Stat.
[1] Reasonable expert witness fees for trial testimony and preparation time must be taxed as costs under Florida law.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“reasonable expert witness fee for trial testimony "shall be taxed as costs"”
Citing § 92.231(2), Fla. Stat., the court explained the mandatory nature of awarding expert witness trial testimony costs.
Appellants appealed a trial court order taxing costs after a jury verdict, disputing the denial of costs for expert witness trial testimony and prepar…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Taxing Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The cause before us is an appeal from an order taxing costs after a jury verdict. The trial court abused its discretion in refusing to award costs for trial testimony of expert witnesses identified in paragraphs 4(www), (yyy) and (zzz) (Dr. Fral-icker only) of the motions to tax costs. § 92.231(2), Fla. Stat. (reasonable expert witness fee for trial testimony “shall be taxed as costs”). Additionally, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to award costs for preparation time in connection with the expert witnesses identified in paragraph 4(zzz). Payne v. Spier, 562 So. 2d 440, 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)(citing Bystrom v. Florida Rock Indus., Inc., 513 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)). We must, therefore, remand to the trial court with directions to tax costs for these experts’ preparation time and trial testimony. As to the other disputed items of costs, Appellants fail to show that the trial court abused its discretion, and we therefore affirm. Hyster Co. v. Stephens, 560 So. 2d 1334, 1337 (Fla. 1st DCA)(citing Siebert v. City of Vero Beach, 555 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)), rev. denied, 574 So. 2d 141 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bystrom v. Fla. Rock Indus., Inc., 513 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Hyster Co. v. Stephens, 560 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Eve J. Siebert v. City OF Vero Beach, 555 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Palm Court, Inc. v. Vaughn Durham, 562 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)