MICHAEL E. GOWINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1999-12-23
No. 98-3272
ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
745 So. 2d 1156 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to section 322.201, Florida Statutes (1997), driving records certified by machine imprint are to be accepted as evidence where no genuine issue of authenticity is raised. Kohler v. State, 534 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sylvester v. State, 770 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
    …e information con [*252] tained in the citation is sufficient to carry the state’s burden required of it by State v. Rodriguez, 575 So. 2d 1262 (Fla.1991) and the more recent case of State v. Harbaugh, 754 So. 2d 691 (Fla.2000). See Gowins v. State, 745 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (driving records certified by machine imprint are to be accepted as evidence where no genuine issue of authenticity is raised). I would affirm. . Kohler is still correct in asserting that the certified driving record is admissi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw