RALPH WILLIAMS, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wald v. Athena F. Grainger, 64 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2011)
  …ropriate. Id. A party moving for a directed verdict admits the truth of all facts in evidence and every reasonable conclusion or inference which can be drawn from such evidence favorable to the non-moving party. See Williamson v. Superior Ins. Co., 746 So. 2d 483, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). A directed verdict is proper when the evidence and all inferences from the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, support the mov-ant’s case as a matter of law and there is no evidence to r…
• Sims v. Cristinzio, 898 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …of Fortner’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs. A motion for directed verdict should be granted only where no view of the evidence, or inferences made therefrom, could support a verdict for the non-moving party. Williamson v. Superior Ins. Co., 746 So. 2d 483, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Goolsby v. Qazi, 847 So. 2d 1001, 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). In considering a motion for directed verdict, the court must evaluate the testimony in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and every reasonable inferenc…
• Lasco Enters., Inc. v. Kohlbrand, 819 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
  …his claim. “A party moving for a directed verdict admits the truth of all facts in evidence and every reasonable conclusion or inference which can be drawn from such evidence favorable to the non-moving party.” Williamson v. Superior Insurance Co., 746 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). In challenging a trial court’s denial of a motion for a directed verdict, the burden is on the appellant to show that the trial court erred in so ruling. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1160, 1152 (Fla.19…