IN RE EMMANUELLE MAYNES-TURNER, WARD, APPELLANT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1999-12-15
No. 98-2732
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.
746 So. 2d 564 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in partially restoring competency when objective findings supported full restoration.


Facts & Procedural History

A guardian was appointed for Emmanuelle Maynes-Turner due to injury. She later sought restoration of capacity, and while an examining doctor found her…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

On November 21, 1996, due to a serious injury, Emmanuelle Maynes-Turner was declared incompetent, and her adult son and daughter were named as guardians. Approximately a year and a half later, she filed a Suggestion of Capacity. The trial court followed the examining doctor’s recommendations and only partially restored her rights. We reverse and direct the trial court on remand to restore Ms. Turner to full competency.

The examining doctor reported objective findings consistent with full competency. He indicated that Ms. Turner was aware and knowledgeable during his examination. Additionally, the record reflects that Ms. Turner was aware of the proceedings and knew the state of her affairs. However, the doctor and the trial court both expressed paternalistic feelings about the possibility that she might make future harmful decisions.1 “In our present day paternalistic society we must take care that in our zeal for protecting those who cannot protect themselves we do not unnecessarily deprive them of some rather precious individual rights.” In re McDonnell, 266 So. 2d 87, 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). Absent his paternalistic notion that she might make decisions that could harm her, the doctor found Ms. Turner possessed the requisite level of capacity for full restoration. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to do otherwise, and Ms. Turner should be restored to competency.

For the above reasons, we reverse the trial court’s partial restoration of competency and direct the court to enter an order for full restoration of her rights.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

. The doctor observed that: "Cognitively she does reasonably well. She would seem to possess the necessary knowledge that would be required for restoration, however, I do not know that she could make effective decisions and might pose significant risks for herself on the basis of those decisions that she would make.” The trial court adopted the doctor's recommendations.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McJUNKIN v. McJUNKIN, 896 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
    …sion of the statute, before depriving an individual of “all their civil and legal rights,” the individual must be incapable of exercising his rights at all, whether wisely or otherwise. See § 744.1012. , This case is similar to In re Maynes-Turner, 746 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). There, as here, the examining doctor reported objective findings consistent with full competency but both he and the trial court “expressed paternalistic feelings about the possibility that [Mayes-Turner] might make future harmfu…
  • Losh v. Carlin McKINLEY, 86 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
    …theless true that “[i]n our present day paternalistic society we must take care that in our zeal for protecting those who cannot protect themselves we do not unnecessarily deprive them of some rather precious individual rights.” In re Maynes-Turner, 746 So. 2d 564, 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (quoting In re McDonnell, 266 So. 2d 87, 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)). Because there was not clear and convincing evidence of Losh’s incapacity sufficient to justify the removal of her rights to the extent contained in the order…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw