ALAN SYKES, APPELLANT,
v.
FARMEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., A NONRESIDENT CORPORATION AND FLORIDA I.R.E., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND AS GENERAL PARTNER IN FLORIDA I.R.E., LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES
ALAN SYKES, APPELLANT,
FARMEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., A NONRESIDENT CORPORATION AND FLORIDA I.R.E., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND AS GENERAL PARTNER IN FLORIDA I.R.E., LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES
747 So. 2d 422
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Alan Sykes appeals an order denying his motion for reconsideration of the trial court’s order discharging his notice of lis pendens. We dismiss the appeal because the order denying the motion for reconsideration is not appealable. See Richardson v. Watson, 611 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (holding that a trial court’s order denying a motion for reconsideration of a nonfinal order is not appealable); Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Forrest, 682 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Appeal dismissed.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Colucci v. EAR Rare Auto. Grp., Inc., 918 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…for seven years under the terms of the Letter Agreement. However, we cannot uphold an agreement whose sole purpose is to prevent competition per se; such agreements are void as a matter of public policy. Hapney, 579 So. 2d at 131; Lotenfoe v. Pahk, 747 So. 2d 422, 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Kar Kare suggests this court also assess the balance of harm between Colucci and Kar Kare. We have previously employed such a balancing test. See, e.g., Carnahan v. Alexander Proudfoot Co. World Headquarters, 581 So. 2d 184…
-
NET First Nat'l Bank v. First Telebanc Corp., 834 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…on hearing below. Because we resolve this appeal on the basis of the lack of clear legal right, the only remaining issue we need address is [*951] the bond amount. The “conundrum” presented in this case is like that in Lotenfoe, M.D. v. Pahk, M.D., 747 So. 2d 422, 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), in which the appellate court held both that the appellant was wrongfully enjoined, and that the bond amount was improperly set without an evi-dentiary hearing. Dissolving the injunction left “no functional need to set a new…
-
Advantage Digit. Sys., Inc. v. Digit. Imaging Servs., Inc., 870 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…injunction prohibiting “procuring” of insurance when the plain language of the covenant proscribed “calling upon or soliciting” would not be proper). If a Digital customer approaches Geenen and Foust, that is not solicitation, see Lotenfoe v. Pahk, 747 So. 2d 422, 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), but would be proscribed “contact” under the injunction. Because the noncompetition agreements prohibit only solicitation, that is the only activity that can be the subject of an injunction based on the parties’ contracts. A…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Richardson v. Watson, 611 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Forrest, 682 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)