IESHA DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-12-10
No. 97-04604
PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
747 So. 2d 427 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Iesha Davis’s conviction for grand theft. We note, however, that the record reveals that the actual value of the items stolen was never proven in the trial of this case, and we cannot discern whether the parties had made a formal stipulation as to value prior to trial. It is clear that the defense made no motion for judgment of acquittal directed to that issue. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice for Ms. Davis to raise this issue, if it is appropriate to do so, on a motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ortiz v. State, 807 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
    …nclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to relief. Appellant’s allegation that his attorney was ineffective, for failing to object to a departure sentence not accompanied by written reasons, is legally sufficient. See Moore v. State, 747 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Therefore, as to this ground, we reverse with direction to the trial court to either attach portions of the record refuting Appellant’s claim or to hold an evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the order is affirmed. PO…
  • Mejia v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw